This week, the reported exposure of personal data belonging to hundreds of thousands of aid recipients in Gaza highlights the immense responsibility carried by humanitarian actors collecting and processing sensitive information. In contexts of crisis and forcible displacement, data protection is not merely technical but a matter of security and safeguarding fundamental human rights.
The incident underscores the urgent need for stronger safeguards, greater transparency regarding what data is collected and why, and robust accountability mechanisms to mitigate potential harm. At the same time, continued reports of arbitrary content moderation, censorship, and restrictions on civic space demonstrate that challenges to Palestinian digital rights remain multifaceted. As digital technologies become increasingly embedded in humanitarian, social, and political life, rights-based governance, transparency, and accountability must remain at the center of digital transformation efforts.
A cyber-attack targeting the World Food Programme has exposed sensitive personal information belonging to some 600,000 households in Gaza, the UN’s food agency has confirmed, in what may be the largest-known breach of humanitarian beneficiary data to date. WFP is investigating a “security-related incident” in which “unauthorised actors” accessed personal information submitted by Palestinians in Gaza, the agency said in a statement sent to aid recipients via Telegram on 31 May. The exposed information included names, ID and mobile numbers, and location data, the statement said. WFP confirmed the data breach on 2 June: “WFP recently detected unauthorized access of its self-registration application (SRA) for Palestine, where individuals are able to register to receive food and cash assistance after verification,” a spokesperson said in a statement responding to questions from The New Humanitarian. “WFP took immediate action to shut down the platform, contain the intrusion, and strengthen its security controls to prevent further exposure.” More than 2 million people in Gaza have submitted their personal information to WFP’s self-registration application, known as People Portal, which the WFP credits for cutting registration red tape and response times. The spokesperson said the compromised data is “isolated to the SRA application used only in Palestine”.
A new Israeli digital registry imposes de facto sovereignty over 60% of the West Bank. Palestinians must register under Israeli authority or risk losing their land, but Israeli legal loopholes are designed to invalidate their claims either way. Israel’s annexation of the West Bank is moving full steam ahead on the ground, but it’s also going online. Last Wednesday, the Israeli government launched a new digital platform for registering lands in the West Bank, open for use by Israelis and Israeli corporations. The new platform allows the registration of property and applies to lands in Area C of the West Bank, which comprises over 60% of the territory under the 1993 Oslo Accords. The rest of the West Bank is divided into Areas A and B, where the Palestinian Authority (PA) has varying degrees of civil and security control. The launching of the platform comes on the heels of previous Israeli moves to alter how land ownership works in the West Bank, starting with an Israeli government decision in June 2025 to make Palestinian lands in Area C open to registration by anybody, including Israeli settlers. Since then, the Israeli government has taken several more steps to advance its annexation of the West Bank — not only with laws that lay the groundwork for annexation, but by exercising actual Israeli authority over Palestinian lands.
Meta-owned platform Instagram abruptly suspended the official account of The Palestine Chronicle on Saturday, cutting off the independent media outlet from its global audience before quietly restoring access hours later, following an immediate appeal. The suspension occurred without prior warning or notification of any policy violation. Furthermore, Meta provided no explanation for why the account was taken down, nor did the company issue a statement, apology, or clarification upon reinstating it. “The account was turned off, our access was completely blocked, and then, following our swift appeal, it was suddenly turned back on,” said Ramzy Baroud, editor-in-chief of The Palestine Chronicle. “At no point in this process did Meta communicate with us to explain what rules we supposedly violated or why the decision was reversed. This arbitrary move disrupts vital journalism at a critical time,” Baroud added.
Instagram users report facing account bans, temporary blocks, or permanent suspension on Instagram for posting about. This has highlighted the strict, automated enforcement mechanisms governing modern social media platforms. The issue often intersects with broader movements, such as global “#Blockout” campaigns, where social media users actively coordinate to unfollow, block, or purge specific accounts—often belonging to celebrities, influencers, or corporations—due to perceived political stances or silence regarding the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. When users attempt to manually remove dozens or hundreds of followers or rapidly unfollow accounts associated with Gaza content, Instagram’s security algorithms frequently flag this behavior as “coordinated inauthentic behavior,” bot-like activity, or a violation of platform guidelines. Independent rights groups and digital advocacy organizations, such as Human Rights Watch and the digital rights group 7amleh, have heavily documented how Meta’s algorithmic moderation frequently misinterprets human solidarity or protest actions as automation.
East Jerusalem has long been a centre of Palestinian cultural, religious, and community life. Today, however, Israeli policies are placing growing pressure on the people and organisations working to protect that identity. A new report by DCA/NCA documents how journalists, students, artists, lawyers, community leaders, and local organisations face arrests, surveillance, online censorship, financial restrictions, and increasing limitations on their work and daily lives. Journalists risk detention and harassment while reporting from the ground. Young people and activists think twice before posting online or joining public activities. And cultural centres, youth clubs, and community organisations struggle to keep their doors open as authorities cancel events, restrict funding, and increase pressure on civic initiatives. Despite growing restrictions, journalists continue documenting realities on the ground, artists continue creating, and local organisations continue supporting their communities and defending fundamental rights.
And stay updated with our latest activities, news, and publications!